An FBI agent advised a federal jury Tuesday that she knew she was proper to research the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Division on allegations of inmate abuse inside Males’s Central Jail, due to the best way she was later handled by deputies.
Particular agent Leah Tanner returned to the stand in a downtown Los Angeles federal courtroom in a corruption case towards former Los Angeles County Sheriff Lee Baca, who prosecutors allege was conscious of his excessive-rating officers’ intentions to impede FBI brokers from probing deeper into extreme use of pressure on inmates by deputies.
Tanner had testified for the prosecution on Monday that telephone data the FBI compiled present Baca, Undersheriff Paul Tanaka and different prime brass stored in fixed contact with one another after they discovered a flip telephone had been planted by the FBI inside Males’s Central Jail in August, 2011. The flip telephone was for use by inmate Anthony Brown, to report extreme pressure and corruption contained in the jails. She stated these calls correspond with a collection of occasions. For instance, Brown’s data have been falsified, his id modified and he was hidden from FBI brokers. Later, two deputies threatened Tanner with arrest at her residence.
However Nathan Hochman, Baca’s protection lawyer, labored for 5 hours Tuesday to select an element Tanner’s testimony from the day earlier than.
Throughout his cross examination, Hochman went over her expertise, mentioning that in the course of the time of the investigation, she had been with the FBI for a few yr. He requested her why she deceived a deputy who needed to go on a date together with her by not telling him why she was interviewing inmates within the jails. She and the deputy met on a handful of events, however Tanner disagreed with the phrase “deceive.”
“We needed to conduct our investigation and we didn’t need anybody to know,” she stated. “I used to be principally making an attempt to not inform him.”
Hochman additionally needed to know if Brown ever recorded any video or took pictures with the flip telephone that was smuggled to him. Tanner stated no. He requested her if she believed Brown’s life was in peril after the deputies discovered his telephone. Once more, Tanner replied no.
Then, utilizing the charts of calls she compiled between Baca, Tanaka, and others on the chain of command, Hochman requested Tanner if she knew for positive that the calls made between them meant they really spoke to at least one one other. A few of the telephone numbers, he identified, belonged to Baca’s driver.
“You don’t know what was stated in that 2-minute name?” Hochman requested, mentioning one name particularly.
“No,” Tanner responded.
Hochman then performed for the jury a muted surveillance video taken by undercover sheriff’s detectives. The video exhibits two sheriff’s sergeants ready for Tanner in entrance of her house constructing. The encounter exhibits the second once they threatened her with arrest. Hochman timed the encounter and requested Tanner if she thought it was a few minute or…