Even If Jury Finds Price Guilty, Judge Will Likely Dismiss Mail Fraud Charges


Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at four a.m.

John Wiley Price

John Wiley Worth

Brandon Thibodeaux

Dallas County Commissioner John Wiley Worth might see a number of the fees towards him dismissed even when a federal jury finds him responsible. Throughout a listening to Monday morning, U.S. District Decide Barbara Lynn repeatedly questioned the validity of a few of the authorities’s costs towards Worth. By late Monday afternoon, she indicated that she could also be inclined to switch the jury’s verdict on conspiracy to commit bribery and mail fraud costs.

The federal government’s argument in favor of these fees goes like this: Political marketing consultant Kathy Nealy bought automobiles and let Worth use them. In doing so, she helped the businesses she represented bribe Worth to assist their pursuits. And since she mailed funds on these automobiles, Nealy and Worth engaged in mail fraud.

Protection attorneys argued that the funds weren’t a part of any alleged bribery conspiracy, even when that conspiracy existed. On Monday afternoon, Lynn agreed, telling attorneys on each side that she “ninety nine % positive” she would dismiss the mail fraud costs towards Worth, even when the jury discovered him responsible on these counts, in response to KXAS’ Ken Kalthoff.

“If these have been the one counts I might not submit them,” Lynn stated.

Not dealing with the mail fraud expenses enormously lessens Worth’s potential sentence. Every of the remaining counts towards him — conspiracy to commit bribery, conspiracy to commit tax fraud and submitting a false tax return —carries a most sentence of between three and 5 years.

Federal mail fraud may be punished with as much as a 20 yr sentence. Whereas Worth will lose his seat on the Dallas County Commissioner’s Courtroom with any felony conviction, it seems that what might’ve been a de facto life sentence is off the desk.

Lynn additionally brazenly questioned whether or not prosecutors proved that a quid professional quo existed between Worth and Nealy. Nealy, set to go on trial later this yr for bribery, is accused of being the center lady between Worth and the businesses she represented. In change for money from Nealy, Worth is accused of passing alongside confidential info and offering affect to and on behalf of Nealy shoppers. Prosecutors haven’t any smoking gun, like video or audio recordings, proving that funds made by Nealy to Worth have been truly bribes.

“Individuals get to make funds to public officers,” Lynn stated, in line with reporters within the courtroom room.

Assistant U.S. Lawyer Nicholas Bunch argued with Lynn that agreements do not all the time should be spoken or written. A quid professional quo between Nealy and Worth could possibly be implied or inferred by jurors, Bunch informed Lynn, who countered that Worth typically voted towards Nealy’s shoppers. “He does not all the time do what she needs,” Lynn stated.

Closing arguments in The United State of America v. John Wiley Worth, et al. start Tuesday morning.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *