Decomposing bodies in a barrel: High court rules killer won’t ever be freed

Photo via Pixabay
Photograph by way of Pixabay

The California Supreme Courtroom refused Wednesday to assessment the case of a felon convicted of murdering his two roommates, whose decomposing our bodies have been present in a barrel behind the Chatsworth home the three had shared.

The state’s highest courtroom denied a protection petition asking it to think about the case towards Brent Darrin Zubek, who’s serving life in jail with out the potential for parole for the capturing deaths of Oletta Jean Williams, 28, and John David Lee, forty.

Zubek was captured after a ten-day manhunt during which he fired at a police detective and, then hours later, pointed a gun at cops. He was shot within the hip by police, however no officers have been injured.

Zubek’s former housemates have been discovered lifeless on Aug. 12, 2011, however the two had been killed about six weeks earlier. Their our bodies have been stuffed inside a barrel, moved to no less than one storage facility, then moved again to the home after others on the storage facility complained a few foul odor, in line with Deputy District Lawyer Michael Blake.

The prosecutor stated there was no clear-minimize motive for the killings.

Zubek — who was convicted of federal financial institution theft expenses in 1993 — acted as his personal lawyer throughout his trial on the San Fernando courthouse, through which he was convicted of first-diploma homicide, six counts of assault with a firearm upon a peace officer and one rely of possession of a firearm by a felon.

In a ruling final December, a 3-justice panel from California’s 2nd District Courtroom of Attraction rejected Zubek’s declare that he was denied a good trial as a result of a decide required him to stay seated in courtroom whereas he was representing himself.

“Based mostly on defendant’s felony report he posed a safety concern, and it was affordable to require that he stay seated,” the appellate panel discovered. “Proscribing defendant’s motion didn’t bear the indicia of guilt probably undermining the presumption of innocence akin to shackles or different bodily restraints.”

The justices additionally rejected the defendant’s declare that his conviction on six counts of assault on a peace officer weren’t supported by substantial proof. They stated it was undisputed that he shot his firearm as one of many officers pursued him, and famous one other officer testified that Zubek was standing on a rooftop when he pointed his firearm at a whole workforce of officers positioned on the bottom with out cowl.

— Metropolis Information Service

>> Need to learn extra tales like this? Get our Free Every day Newsletters Right here!

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *